Week 11 Study Guide — Normal Stress and Strain + Mechanical Properties
//body
← Back to weekDirectly supported by notes
These sub-topics are explicitly covered in the lecture slides and tutorial PDFs:
| Topic | Direct source coverage |
|---|---|
| Axial stress | Slides 4–7 + Tutorial recap 3 + Exercises 1, 4, 5 |
| Axial strain | Slides 8–9 + Tutorial recap 4 + Exercises 1, 6 |
| Hooke’s law / Young’s modulus | Slides 11–12 + Tutorial recap 5–6 + Exercise 2 |
| Engineering vs. true stress / strain | Slide 13 |
| Stress–strain diagram (yield, UTS, fracture) | Slide 14 + Tutorial recap 9–10 + Exercise 3 |
| 0.2% offset yield method | Slide 16 + Tutorial recap 11 + Exercise 3 |
| Ductility (%EL, %AR) | Slide 15 |
| Factor of safety + allowable stress | Slides 18–19 + Tutorial recap 14 + Exercise 5 |
| Cable car worked example | Slide 20 (Example 5) |
| Poisson’s ratio | Slides 21–23 + Tutorial recap 16–17 + Exercise 6 |
The workshop expects you to be able to:
- Free-body a joint, solve for the axial force, then compute .
- Find and read the resulting .
- Compute from a stress/strain pair or read it as a slope.
- Read yield, UTS, and the 0.2% offset yield from a plotted – curve.
- Apply a safety factor to size a member or count passengers.
- Use Poisson’s ratio to predict lateral deformation and cross-sectional change.
Strongly inferred from workshop materials
The lecture also frames (in this order):
- Structural actions (slide 3) — tension, compression, shear, bending, torsion, loading combinations. EGD102 limits itself to axial + shear.
- A worked free-body / equilibrium step in Example 2 (the two-rod lamp).
- The “Force is ALWAYS in newtons” reminder at the top of every unit-sensitive calculation.
- Rule-of-thumb ranges by industry (slide 19).
- Typical Poisson’s ratios for common materials (slide 22).
Possible lecture content (not in notes)
May appear in the lecture but is not in the workshop:
- Hooke’s-law assumptions (small strain, homogeneous + isotropic material).
- Resilience and toughness as areas under the – curve.
- True stress–strain conversion formulas .
- Hardness measures (Brinell, Rockwell, Vickers) as proxies for strength.
Gaps requiring official source check
- Whether the final exam asks for engineering vs. true numerical comparisons or just the qualitative distinction.
- Whether the 0.2% offset is examined symbolically (read off a curve) or numerically (from given gradient + slope).
- Solutions PDF for Tutorial 11 is not provided — exercise answers below are the expected forms but should be cross-checked against the official sheet.
Worked examples
Three notes cover the topic at different depths:
- Lecture summary — slide-by-slide reconstruction with worked Examples 1, 2, 3, 5 and Example 5 continued.
- Cheatsheet — every formula and recipe on one page. Includes the full quiz.
- In-depth analysis — why each formula exists, the physical picture behind necking and Poisson’s ratio, and a full exam-style worked example for the aluminium rod (Exercise 6).
Common mistakes
- Unit slip: mixing kN with mm² gives GPa, not MPa. Convert force to N first.
- Steel in MPa instead of GPa — off by 1000.
- 0.5% = 0.005, not .
- Missing minus sign on Poisson’s ratio: definition has it.
- Rounding people up rather than down when sizing for .
- Confusing yield, UTS, and fracture stress — three distinct points on the curve.
- Forgetting trig sign conventions at joints (is the 3 the vertical leg of the 3-4-5?).
Practice questions
Pick from Tutorial 11. Recommended pass:
- Stress + strain: Exercises 1, 2.
- Stress–strain diagram + offset yield: Exercise 3.
- Multi-member free body: Exercise 4 (two-wire bilinear curve).
- Factor of safety / sizing: Exercise 5 (flowerpot).
- Poisson’s ratio: Exercise 6 (aluminium rod) — fully worked in the in-depth note.
Quick answer-form hints:
| Exercise | Quantity asked | Hint |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | , | ; ; |
| 2 | , , then | |
| 3 | , | Slope of linear part; 0.2% offset line parallel to slope |
| 4 | , | Joint equilibrium ; ; pick branch of bilinear curve; |
| 5 | ; ; | |
| 6 | , | , , ; ; |
Assessment relevance
- This week feeds Portfolio 10/11 directly.
- Final exam: high probability of a multi-part tensile-test or cable-loading question that walks through stress → strain → modulus → safety factor → diameter change in sequence.
- The Poisson’s-ratio diameter-change step is a common “show all working” item.
Confidence report
- Directly supported: every formula, slide-cited example, and tutorial exercise listed above.
- Inferred: the lecture’s narrative ordering and the framing of structural actions.
- Gap: solutions to Tutorial 11 (no solutions PDF supplied); coverage depth of true-stress numerical conversion.
Source files used
EGD102-Physics/Lecture11_CTP1.pdfEGD102-Physics/Tutorial 11.pdf